
AI buying has a weird rhythm where week one is optimism, week two is demos, week three is “we’ll run a pilot,” and by week six you’re staring at three similar options and a longer spreadsheet than you wanted. Humm that solution looked cool! but missing success criteria, fuzzy constraints, and a solution that looks great but collapses under security, data, and day-to-day adoption, will might break the process
A little of “home work” first
Before you book another demo, get specific on three things.
First: what process are we improving? (ticket replies, campaign briefs, sales forecasting, invoice matching).
Second: what does “worked” mean? Pick one primary metric such for example time saved, cost reduced, conversion lift, accuracy/quality and one backup.
Third: what’s non-negotiable? Data access, compliance, integrations, budget, languages, permissions.
Do this upfront and a lot of AI Solutions will drop off the list on their own.
Checklist
For each solution, check this list. If you can’t get a clear “yes,” it’s a risk.
Fits the exact use case (not a generic demo)
Works with your stack (SSO + key integrations)
Clear data rules (where data goes, retention, access)
Security is provable (docs, controls, answers)
Roles & permissions exist (not “everyone can”)
Audit logs are available (traceable actions)
Actions are controlled (guardrails/approvals)
Quality is measurable (basic evals / test set)
Safety is handled (prompt injection isn’t ignored)
Monitoring exists (failures + drift, not just usage)
Time to value is weeks (with a plan)
Year-1 cost is clear (license + setup + run)
Shortcut: if it can’t pass security/data or it can’t fit your stack, stop wasting time and move on.
Quick test
Pick up 3 tools and score each line 0–3 (0 = no, 3 = excellent). Keep it fast, your goal is to find a clear winner in the game.
Solution A:
Use case fit: __ /3
Integrations: __ /3
Security + data: __ /3
Permissions + logs: __ /3
Quality (evals): __ /3
Time to value: __ /3
Total cost (year 1): __ /3
TOTAL: __ /21
Evaluate the other two using the same template.
Comments